Pre-incisional local infiltration with levobupivacaine in laparoscopic cholecystectomy: a randomized and clinical trial.

OBJECTIVE: Laparoscopic cholecystectomy (LC), despite its minimally invasive nature, requires effective control of post-operative pain. The use of local anesthetics (LA) has been studied, but the level of evidence is low, and there is little information on important parameters such as health-related quality of life (HRQoL) or return to work. The objective of the study was to evaluate the efficacy of 0.50% levobupivacaine infiltration of incisional sites in reducing POP after LC. METHODS: This was a prospective, randomized, double-blind study. Patients undergoing elective LC were randomized into two groups: no infiltration (control group) and port infiltration (intervention group). POP intensity (numerical rating scale, NRS), need for rescue with opioid drugs, PONV incidence, HRQoL, and return to work data, among others, were studied. RESULTS: Two hundred and twelve patients were randomized and analyzed: 105 (control group) and 107 (intervention group). A significant difference was observed in the NRS values (control group mean NRS score: 3.41 ± 1.82 vs. 2.56 ± 1.96) (p < 0.05) and in the incidence of PONV (31.4% vs. 19.6%) (p = 0.049). CONCLUSIONS: Levobupivacaine infiltration is safe and effective in reducing POP, although this does not lead to a shorter hospital stay and does not influence HRQoL, return to work, or overall patient satisfaction.

OBJETIVO: la colecistectomía laparoscópica (CL), a pesar de su carácter mínimamente invasivo, requiere un control efectivo del dolor postoperatorio (POP). El uso de anestésicos locales (AL) ha sido estudiado pero el nivel de evidencia es bajo y existe poca información acerca de parámetros relevantes como la calidad de vida relacionada con la salud (CVRS) o la reincorporación laboral. El objetivo de este estudio es analizar la eficacia de la infiltración de los sitios incisionales con levobupivacaína 0,50% en la reducción del dolor postoperatorio tras la CL. MATERIAL Y MÉTODOS: estudio prospectivo, aleatorizado y doble ciego. Pacientes sometidos a CL programada fueron aleatorizados en dos grupos: sin infiltración (grupo control) y con infiltración preincisional (grupo intervención). La intensidad del dolor (escala de puntuación numérica, NRS), la necesidad de rescates con opioides, la incidencia de náuseas o vómitos postoperatorios (NVPO) y datos de CVRS o reincorporación laboral, entre otros, fueron recogidos. RESULTADOS: 212 pacientes fueron aleatorizados y analizados: 105 en el grupo control y 107 en el grupo de intervención. Se observó una diferencia estadísticamente significativa en la intensidad del dolor (puntuación media NRS: 3.41 ± 1.82 vs. 2.56 ± 1.96) (p < 0.05) y en la incidencia de NVPO (31.4% vs. 19.6%) (p = 0.049). CONCLUSIONES: La infiltración con levobupivacaína es segura y efectiva en la reducción del dolor postoperatorio, aunque esto no conlleva una menor estancia hospitalaria y no influye en los resultados de CVRS, reincorporación laboral o satisfacción del paciente.

Streptococcus pneumoniae Infection in Patients with Asplenia: A Spanish Perspective over a 25-Year Period.

Anatomical or functional asplenia constitutes a risk factor for Streptococcus pneumoniae (SP) infection, being more frequent in children and the elderly and in people with multiple comorbidities. We aimed to describe the impact of invasive pneumococcal disease (IPD) on the clinical features and outcomes of patients hospitalized for asplenia in Spain. Discharge reports from the Spanish Minimum Basic Data Set were used to retrospectively analyze hospital discharge data with a diagnosis of asplenia from 1997 to 2021. A total of 132,257 patients with asplenia (splenectomized/non-splenectomized) were identified from the Spanish database. Among the cases, 177 (37.5%) patients with splenectomy and 295 (62.5%) patients without splenectomy developed IPD. The clinical presentations (non-infection vs. infection) did not significantly differ between the two reference groups, except for patients with COPD, rheumatoid disease, AIDS, other neurological disorders, metastatic cancer, and drug abuse. The risk factors for IPD were also more frequently reported in patients without splenectomy (p < 0.001) and with comorbidities (p = 0.005). The study of patients with asplenia provides relevant information about the state of SP infection. This epidemiological tracking can serve to better understand the comorbidities that affect them, the risk factors for the disease, the prediction of antibiotic use, and vaccination in public health, among other factors.

Legionellosis-Associated Hospitalization in Spain from 2002 to 2021.

Legionellosis is a respiratory disease of bacterial and environmental origin that usually presents two distinct clinical entities, "Legionnaires' disease" (LD) and "Pontiac fever". LD is an important cause of hospital-acquired pneumonia (HAP). The objective of this study is to describe the epidemiology of legionellosis-associated hospitalization (L-AH) in Spain from 2002 to 2021 and the burden of hospitalization due to legionellosis. Discharge reports from the Minimum Basic Data Set (MBDS) were used to retrospectively analyze hospital discharge data with a diagnosis of legionellosis, based on the ICD-9-CM and ICD-10-CM diagnosis codes, from 2002 to 2021. 21,300 L-AH occurred throughout the year during 2002-2021. The incidence of hospitalization associated per 100,000 inhabitants by month showed a similar trend for the 2002-2011, 2012-2021, and 2002-2021 periods. In Spain, during 2002-2021, the hospitalization rate (HR) in the autonomous communities ranged from 4.57 (2002-2011) to 0.24 (2012-2021) cases per 100,000 inhabitants. The HR of legionellosis in Spain has substantially increased across the 2002-2021 period, and the estimate is consistent with available European data. It is considered that in-depth epidemiological surveillance studies of legionellosis and improvements in the prevention and control of the disease are required in Spain.

The Prevalence and Impact of Nutritional Risk and Malnutrition in Gastrointestinal Surgical Oncology Patients: A Prospective, Observational, Multicenter, and Exploratory Study.

A prospective, observational, multicenter, and exploratory study was conducted in 469 gastrointestinal cancer patients undergoing elective surgery. The Malnutrition Universal Screening Tool (MUST) and the Global Leadership Initiative on Malnutrition (GLIM) criteria were used to assess nutritional risk. On admission, 17.9% and 21.1% of patients were at moderate (MUST score 1) and severe (MUST score ≥ 2) nutritional risk, respectively. The GLIM criteria used in patients with a MUST score ≥ 2 showed moderate malnutrition in 35.3% of patients and severe in 64.6%. Forty-seven percent of patients with a MUST score ≥ 2 on admission had the same score at discharge, and 20.7% with a MUST score 0 had moderate/severe risk at discharge. Small bowel, esophageal, and gastric cancer and diabetes were predictors of malnutrition on admission. Complications were significantly higher among patients with a MUST score 1 or ≥2 either on admission (p = 0.001) or at discharge (p < 0.0001). In patients who received nutritional therapy (n = 231), 43% continued to have moderate/severe nutritional risk on discharge, and 54% of those with MUST ≥ 2 on admission maintained this score at discharge. In gastrointestinal cancer patients undergoing elective surgery, there is an urgent need for improving nutritional risk screening before and after surgery, as well as improving nutritional therapy during hospitalization.

Legionella pneumophila Risk from Air-Water Cooling Units Regarding Pipe Material and Type of Water.

Legionellosis is a respiratory disease related to environmental health. There have been manifold studies of pipe materials, risk installations and legionellosis without considering the type of transferred water. The objective of this study was to determine the potential development of the causative agent Legionella pneumophila regarding air-water cooling units, legislative compliance, pipe material and type of water. Forty-four hotel units in Andalusia (Spain) were analysed with respect to compliance with Spanish health legislation for the prevention of legionellosis. The chi-square test was used to explain the relationship between material-water and legislative compliance, and a biplot of the first two factors was generated. Multiple correspondence analysis (MCA) was performed on the type of equipment, legislative compliance, pipe material and type of water, and graphs of cases were constructed by adding confidence ellipses by categories of the variables. Pipe material-type of water (p value = 0.29; p < 0.05) and legislative compliance were not associated (p value = 0.15; p < 0.05). Iron, stainless steel, and recycled and well water contributed the most to the biplot. MCA showed a global pattern in which lead, iron and polyethylene were well represented. Confidence ellipses around categories indicated significant differences among categories. Compliance with Spanish health legislation regarding the prevention and control of legionellosis linked to pipe material and type of water was not observed.

Seroprevalence of SARS-CoV2 Infections in Health Care Personnel in a Long-Term Care Institution After the First Wave of the Pandemic: A Cross-Sectional Study.

BACKGROUND: At the time of our study, occupational health evidence specific for long-term care employees was mostly lacking. The purpose of this study was to determine the proportion of positive cases in employees after the first COVID-19 wave in May 2020. We also determined the prevalence of asymptomatic cases. METHOD: The study population included all health care workers (HCW) employed at one mid-size long-term hospital in Spain (May 2020). A cross-sectional study design included an interviewer-administered self-reported questionnaire (including sociodemographic questions, risk factors for COVID-19 complications such as hypertension or diabetes, and previous polymerase chain reaction [PCR] results) and antibody determination (Biozek rapid test). Data were analyzed using Student's t, Fisher, and chi-square tests. Two multivariate logistic models were created to evaluate exposure factors and symptoms separately on the outcome of having had COVID-19. FINDINGS: Of the 97% of workers who participated (580/596), 300 (51.7%) suffered symptoms of COVID-19, 161 (27.8%) of the rapid antibody tests were positive for IgM and/or IgG, 160 (27.6%) workers had at least one risk factor, and 32 (19.0%) of the 168 SARS-CoV-2-positive cases were asymptomatic. The proportion of negative or unavailable PCRs, with positive antibody, was 11.7% (56/477). Casual contact without protection (odds ratio [OR]: 1.9, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.1-3.4), doctor occupation (OR 3.3, 95% CI: 1.1-10.2), and nursing assistant occupation (OR 2.5, 95% CI: 1.2-5.8) were independently associated with SARS-CoV-2 infection. CONCLUSION: Physicians and nursing assistants in a long-term care setting were at a higher risk of SARS-COV-2 infection over other occupations in the first wave of the pandemic, especially when in contact with patients without protection. Almost one-fifth of the workers with a positive PCR test for SARS-COV-2 were asymptomatic and seroprevalence (27.8%) was well below the approximated herd immunity cutoff (60-70%). Essential workers in long-term care must be monitored frequently by Employee Health Service and should be required to wear personal protective equipment including a fit-tested N-95 while in close contact with patients and coworkers.

Importancia de la higiene de manos en la atención sanitaria / Importance Of Hand Hygiene In Health Care

Los pacientes que reciben asistencia sanitaria están expuestos a factores de riesgo de infección (Organización Mundial de laSalud 2009). Las infecciones relacionadas con la asistencia sanitaria son una de las complicaciones más frecuentes y conllevanun aumento de la morbi-mortalidad y de insatisfacción con el sistema sanitario (NICE 2018). Además, producen un aumento decostes y el tratamiento favorece el desarrollo de resistencias antimicrobianas. La higiene de manos es esencial para la prevenciónde las infecciones relacionadas con la asistencia sanitaria y la observación directa de la adecuación de la higiene de manos esel patrón oro para evaluarla, aunque tiene limitaciones. La literatura científica muestra una baja adecuación de la higiene demanos y sugiere que la observación enmascarada evalúa mejor la adecuación que la observación abierta. Aunque la adecuaciónde la higiene de manos es baja se puede mejorar con algunas estrategias y con formación, como interviniendo en la educación yformación de los pacientes y de los profesionales, observando de forma continuada la adecuación, comunicando y discutiendo losresultados con los agentes implicados, con campañas y actividades de sensibilización y con la formación con simulación.(AU)

Patients receiving health care are exposed to the risk of infection (World Health Organization 2009). Healthcare-associated infectionis the most common untoward event reported among inpatients, resulting in considerable morbidity, mortality, distress, anddecreased satisfaction with health care (National Institute for Health and Care Excellence 2018). It also results in increased costs,and treatment hastens the development of antimicrobial resistance. Hand hygiene (HH) is essential for the prevention of healthcare-associated infections (HAIs) and direct observation of hand hygiene compliance is the gold standard despite limitations andpotential for bias. Scientific literature highlights poorer hand higiene compliance and suggests that covert monitoring may givebetter compliance estimates than overt monitoring. Compliance rates of HH are low, although improvement is possible using somestrategies and training, such as interventions on improving patients’ hand hygiene, education of both patients and healthcareworkers, monitoring and providing feedback on hand hygiene, campaigns and cues and training with simulation.(AU)

Knowledge and Practices of Digestive Surgeons concerning Specialized Nutritional Support in Cancer Patients: A Survey Study.

A survey study based on a 21-item questionnaire was conducted to assess knowledge and practices of digestive surgeons focused on nutritional support in gastrointestinal cancer patients. At least 5 staff digestive surgeons from 25 tertiary care hospitals throughout Spain were invited to participate and 116 accepted. Malnutrition was correctly defined by 81.9% of participants. In patients undergoing major abdominal surgery, 55.2% considered that preoperative nutritional support is indicated in all patients with malnutrition for a period of 7-14 days. For the diagnosis of malnutrition, only 18.1% of participants selected unintentional weight loss together with a fasting or semi-fasting period of more than one week. Regarding the advantages of enteral infusion, 93.7% of participants considered preservation of the integrity of the intestinal mucosa and barrier function, and in relation to peripheral parenteral nutrition, 86.2% selected the definition of nutrient infusion through a peripheral vein and 81.9% its indication for less than 7 days. Digestive surgeons had a limited knowledge of basic aspects of clinical nutrition in cancer patients, but there was some variability regarding clinical practice in individual cases. These findings indicate the need to develop standardized clinical protocols as well as a national consensus on nutrition support in cancer patients.

[Adequacy of pre-surgical hand hygiene in an university teaching hospital in Madrid (Spain).] / Adecuación de la higiene prequirúrgica de manos en un hospital universitario de Madrid.

OBJECTIVE: We know the importance of hand hygiene in the prevention of healthcare-associated infections. However, its compliance is still a challenge. Moreover, when it is complied with, as in the case of preoperative hygiene, there are few studies on the proper performance of the technique. The aim of this paper is to assess adequacy of pre-surgical hand hygiene in operating room staff of different surgical specialities at a university teaching hospital in Madrid. METHODS: A cross-sectional study was made. Adequacy of pre-surgical hand hygiene was assessed in operating room staff of the different specialities and professional categories by direct covert observation. It was evaluated in 852 opportunities during the months of October, November and December 2020. A specific form was designed for data collection, following the recommendations of the World Health Organisation (WHO). Adequacy was described with frequency distributions of the different groups observed. Whether Chi-square or Fisher's exact tests were used to compare the different categories. RESULTS: Pre-surgical hand hygiene opportunities were evaluated, 75.5% in surgeons and 24.5% in nurses. Overall compliance with pre-surgical hand hygiene technique was 80.5 % (686). The most frequent surgical service evaluated was General Surgery with 240 observations. The professional category with the best adequacy was nursing (86.1%) and the surgical service one was Traumatology (90.2%). An stopwatch was used by some 25.8% of the evaluated professionals, with an adequate hygiene time of 96,8% (p<0,05) for that group. CONCLUSIONS: The overall adequacy of pre-surgical hand hygiene in the operating room professionals is high. Significant statistically differences in adequacy are found between professional categories and surgical specialities, with better compliance in nursing staff and in Traumatology. Better results are achieved by the use of an stopwatch.

OBJETIVO: Sabemos la importancia que tiene la higiene de manos en la prevención de infecciones asociadas a la asistencia sanitaria. Sin embargo, a día de hoy, su cumplimiento, es un reto. Además, cuando se cumple, como es el caso de en la higiene prequirúrgica, pocos estudios hay sobre la adecuada realización de la técnica. El objetivo de este estudio fue evaluar la adecuación de la higiene de manos prequirúrgica en profesionales de quirófano de un Hospital Universitario de Madrid. METODOS: Se realizó un estudio descriptivo trasversal. Se evaluó la adecuación de la higiene de manos prequirúrgica mediante observación directa y enmascarada en 852 oportunidades durante los meses de octubre, noviembre y diciembre de 2020. Se consideró adecuada la higiene de manos si ésta se realizaba según la técnica correcta y durante el tiempo indicado. La adecuación de la higiene de manos se describió con la distribución de frecuencias y las diferencias entre categorías se compararon con la prueba x2 de Pearson o prueba exacta de Fisher. RESULTADOS: Se evaluaron las oportunidades de higiene de manos prequirúrgica, el 75,5% en cirujanos y el 24,5% en personal de enfermería. La adecuación global de la higiene de manos fue del 80,5%. La categoría profesional con mejor adecuación fue Enfermería (86,1%) (p<0,05) y el servicio quirúrgico con mejor adecuación fue Traumatología (90,2%) (p<0,05). Un 25,8% de los profesionales evaluados utilizó el apoyo del cronómetro, consiguiendo este grupo una adecuación al tiempo de higiene del 96,8% (p<0,05). CONCLUSIONES: La adecuación global de la higiene de manos prequirúrgica en nuestros profesionales es muy alta. Se encuentran diferencias estadísticamente significativas de cumplimiento entre categorías profesionales y especialidades quirúrgicas, siendo mejor la adecuación en el personal de Enfermería y en la especialidad de Traumatología. El apoyo del cronómetro consigue mejores resultados en la adecuación al tiempo de higiene.

Hospital-Wide SARS-CoV-2 seroprevalence in health care workers in a Spanish teaching hospital.

INTRODUCTION: Hospital-wide SARS-CoV-2 seroprevalence is rarely explored and can identify areas of unexpected risk. We determined the seroprevalence against SARS-CoV-2 in all health care workers (HCW) at a hospital. METHODS: Cross-sectional study (14-27/04/2020). We determined SARS-CoV-2 IgG by ELISA in all HCW including external workers of a teaching hospital in Madrid. They were classified by professional category, working area, and risk for SARS-CoV-2 exposure. RESULTS: Among 2919 HCW, 2590 (88,7%) were evaluated. The mean age was 43.8 years (SD 11.1), and 73.9% were females. Globally, 818 (31.6%) workers were IgG positive with no differences for age, sex or previous diseases. Of these, 48.5% did not report previous symptoms. Seropositivity was more frequent in high- (33.1%) and medium- (33.8%) than in low-risk areas (25.8%, p=0.007), but not for hospitalization areas attending COVID-19 and non-COVID-19 patients (35.5 vs 38.3% p>0.05). HWC with a previous SARS-CoV2 PCR-positive test were IgG seropositive in 90.8%. By multivariate logistic regression analysis seropositivity was significantly associated with being physicians (OR 2.37, CI95% 1.61-3.49), nurses (OR 1.67, CI95% 1.14-2.46), nurse assistants (OR 1.84, CI95% 1.24-2.73), HCW working at COVID-19 hospitalization areas (OR 1.71, CI95% 1.22-2.40), non-COVID-19 hospitalization areas (OR 1.88, CI95% 1.30-2.73), and at the Emergency Room (OR 1.51, CI95% 1.01-2.27). CONCLUSIONS: Seroprevalence uncovered a high rate of infection previously unnoticed among HCW. Patients not suspected of having COVID-19 as well as asymptomatic HCW may be a relevant source for nosocomial SARS-CoV-2 transmission.

Adecuación de la higieneprequirúrgica de manosen un hospital universitariode Madrid / Adequacy of pre-surgical hand hygiene in an university teaching hospital in Madrid (Spain)

FUNDAMENTOS: Sabemos la importancia que tiene la higiene de manos en la prevención de infecciones asociadas a la asistencia sanitaria. Sin embargo, a día de hoy, su cumplimiento, es un reto. Además, cuando se cumple, como es el caso de en la higiene prequirúrgica, pocos estudios hay sobre la adecuada realización de la técnica. El objetivo de este estudio fue evaluar la adecuación de la higiene de manos prequirúrgica en profesionales de quirófano de un Hospital Universitario de Madrid. MÉTODOS: Se realizó un estudio descriptivo trasversal. Se evaluó la adecuación de la higiene de manos prequirúrgica mediante observación directa y enmascarada en 852 oportunidades durante los meses de octubre, noviembre y diciembre de 2020. Se consideró adecuada la higiene de manos si ésta se realizaba según la técnica correcta y durante el tiempo indicado. La adecuación de la higiene de manos se describió con la distribución de frecuencias y las diferencias entre categorías se compararon con la prueba x2 de Pearson o prueba exacta de Fisher. RESULTADOS: Se evaluaron las oportunidades de higiene de manos prequirúrgica, el 75,5% en cirujanos y el 24,5% en personal de enfermería. La adecuación global de la higiene de manos fue del 80,5%. La categoría profesional con mejor adecuación fue Enfermería (86,1%) (p<0,05) y el servicio quirúrgico con mejor adecuación fue Traumatología (90,2%) (p<0,05). Un 25,8% de los profesionales evaluados utilizó el apoyo del cronómetro, consiguiendo este grupo una adecuación al tiempo de higiene del 96,8% (p<0,05). CONCLUSIONES: La adecuación global de la higiene de manos prequirúrgica en nuestros profesionales es muy alta. Se encuentran diferencias estadísticamente significativas de cumplimiento entre categorías profesionales y especialidades quirúrgicas, siendomejor la adecuación en el personal de Enfermería y en la especialidad de Traumatología. El apoyo del cronómetro consigue mejoresresultados en la adecuación al tiempo de higiene.(AU)

BACKGROUND: We know the importance of hand hygiene in the prevention of healthcare-associated infections. However, its compliance is still a challenge. Moreover, when it is complied with, as in the case of preoperative hygiene, there are few studies on the proper performance of the technique. The aim of this paper is to assess adequacy of pre-surgical hand hygiene in operating room staff of different surgical specialities at a university teaching hospital in Madrid. METHODS: A cross-sectional study was made. Adequacy of pre-surgical hand hygiene was assessed in operating room staff of the different specialities and professional categories by direct covert observation. It was evaluated in 852 opportunities during the months of October, November and December 2020. A specific form was designed for data collection, following the recommendations of the World Health Organisation (WHO). Adequacy was described with frequency distributions of the different groups observed. Whether Chi-square or Fisher’s exact tests were used to compare the different categories.RESULTS: Pre-surgical hand hygiene opportunities were evaluated, 75.5% in surgeons and 24.5% in nurses. Overall compliancewith pre-surgical hand hygiene technique was 80.5 % (686). The most frequent surgical service evaluated was General Surgery with 240 observations. The professional category with the best adequacy was nursing (86.1%) and the surgical service one was Traumatology (90.2%). An stopwatch was used by some 25.8% of the evaluated professionals, with an adequate hygiene time of 96,8% (p<0,05) for that group. CONCLUSIONS: The overall adequacy of pre-surgical hand hygiene in the operating room professionals is high. Significant statis-tically differences in adequacy are found between professional categories and surgical specialities, with better compliance in nursingstaff and in Traumatology. Better results are achieved by the use of an stopwatch.(AU)

Hospital-Wide SARS-CoV-2 seroprevalence in health care workers in a Spanish teaching hospital / Seroprevalencia frente a SARS-CoV-2 en 2.590 trabajadores de un hospital universitario español

Introduction: Hospital-wide SARS-CoV-2 seroprevalence is rarely explored and can identify areas of unexpected risk. We determined the seroprevalence against SARS-CoV-2 in all health care workers (HCW) at a hospital. Methods: Cross-sectional study (14-27/04/2020). We determined SARS-CoV-2 IgG by ELISA in all HCW including external workers of a teaching hospital in Madrid. They were classified by professional category, working area, and risk for SARS-CoV-2 exposure. Results: Among 2919 HCW, 2590 (88,7%) were evaluated. The mean age was 43.8 years (SD 11.1), and 73.9% were females. Globally, 818 (31.6%) workers were IgG positive with no differences for age, sex or previous diseases. Of these, 48.5% did not report previous symptoms. Seropositivity was more frequent in high- (33.1%) and medium- (33.8%) than in low-risk areas (25.8%, p=0.007), but not for hospitalization areas attending COVID-19 and non-COVID-19 patients (35.5 vs 38.3% p>0.05). HWC with a previous SARS-CoV2 PCR-positive test were IgG seropositive in 90.8%. By multivariate logistic regression analysis seropositivity was significantly associated with being physicians (OR 2.37, CI95% 1.61–3.49), nurses (OR 1.67, CI95% 1.14–2.46), nurse assistants (OR 1.84, CI95% 1.24–2.73), HCW working at COVID-19 hospitalization areas (OR 1.71, CI95% 1.22–2.40), non-COVID-19 hospitalization areas (OR 1.88, CI95% 1.30–2.73), and at the Emergency Room (OR 1.51, CI95% 1.01–2.27). Conclusions: Seroprevalence uncovered a high rate of infection previously unnoticed among HCW. Patients not suspected of having COVID-19 as well as asymptomatic HCW may be a relevant source for nosocomial SARS-CoV-2 transmission.(AU)

Introducción: Los estudios de seroprevalencia frente a SARS-CoV-2 en los trabajadores sanitarios (TS) permiten identificar áreas de riesgo inesperado en los hospitales. Métodos: Estudio transversal (14-27/04/2020). Se determinó IgG frente a SARS-CoV-2 mediante ELISA en todos los TS, incluidos los externos, de un hospital universitario de Madrid. Se clasificaron por categoría profesional, área de trabajo y riesgo de exposición al SARS-CoV-2. Resultados: Entre 2.919 TS, se evaluaron 2.590 (88,7%); edad media 43,8años (DE11,1) y 73,9% mujeres. Globalmente, 818 (31,6%) trabajadores tuvieron IgG positiva, sin diferencias por edad, sexo o enfermedades previas. De estos, el 48,5% no comunicaron síntomas previos. La seropositividad fue más frecuente en las áreas de alto (33,1%) y medio (33,8%) que en las de bajo riesgo (25,8%, p=0,007), pero similar en las áreas de hospitalización que atendían a pacientes con y sin COVID-19 (35,5 vs 38,3%, p>0,05). El 90,8% de los TS con PCR previa positiva frente a SARS-CoV-2 tuvieron IgG positiva. Por análisis multivariante, la seropositividad se asoció con ser médico (OR2,37, IC95%: 1,61-3,49), enfermero (OR1,67, IC95%: 1,14-2,46), auxiliar de enfermería (OR1,84, IC95%: 1,24-2,73), trabajar en áreas de hospitalización COVID-19 (OR1,71, IC95%: 1,22-2,40) y no COVID-19 (OR1,88, IC95%: 1,30-2,73) y en Urgencias (OR1,51, IC95%: 1,01-2,27). Conclusiones: El estudio de seroprevalencia desveló una alta tasa de infección que pasó desapercibida entre los trabajadores sanitarios. Los pacientes sin sospecha clínica de COVID-19 y los trabajadores sanitarios asintomáticos pueden ser una fuente importante de transmisión nosocomial del SARS-CoV-2.(AU)

Fast Air-to-Liquid Sampler Detects Surges in SARS-CoV-2 Aerosol Levels in Hospital Rooms.

The COVID-19 pandemic highlighted the dangers of airborne pathogen transmission. SARS-CoV-2 is known to be transmitted through aerosols; however, little is known about the dynamics of these aerosols in real environments, the conditions, and the minimum viral load required for infection. Efficiently measuring and capturing pathogens present in the air would help to understand the infection process. Air samplers usually take several hours to obtain an air sample. In this work a fast (1-2 min) method for capturing bioaerosols into a liquid medium has been tested in hospital rooms with COVID-19 patients. This fast sampling allows detecting transient levels of aerosols in the air. SARS-CoV-2 RNA is detected in aerosols from several hospital rooms at different levels. Interestingly, there are sudden boosts of the SARS-CoV-2 load in the air, suggesting that SARS-CoV-2 could be released abundantly at certain moments. These results show that the distribution of SARS-CoV-2-containing aerosols is not homogeneous in the hospital room. This technology is a fast and effective tool for capturing airborne matter in a very short time, which allows for fast decision-making any kind of hazard in the air is detected. It is also useful for a better understanding of aerosols dynamics.

Clinical results and cost-effectiveness of radiofrequency and cyanoacrylate ablation compared with traditional surgical stripping for treating varicose veins.

BACKGROUND: Disease of the venous system is an underappreciated public health problem. Minimally invasive treatments such as radiofrequency ablation (RFA) or cyanoacrylate adhesive ablation (CAA) have almost entirely replaced surgical stripping (SS) of the great and small saphenous veins. The purpose of the present study was to compare the outcomes at 3 years after SS, RFA, and CAA by assessing the incidence of complications and reinterventions and performing a cost-effectiveness analysis. METHODS: From February 2016 to February 2019, all consecutive patients with symptomatic varicose veins treated at vascular department of two hospitals using SS, RFA, or CAA were included in the present study. The clinical outcomes were measured by quality-adjusted life years (QALYs), complications, and reintervention. A comparison with conservative treatment was also performed. A detailed resource use was recorded for each procedure. All costs were normalized to May 2020 U.S. dollars and euros. Analysis of the data was by the treatment received. All statistical tests were two-sided, and the significance level was set at 5%. Two perspectives of the analysis were considered: the social perspective and that of the Spanish Public Health System. The study period was 3 years. No discount rate was applied. RESULTS: A total of 233 patients were enrolled in the present study: SS, n = 90 (38.6%); RFA, 93 (39.9%); and CAA, n = 50 (21.5%). The number of complications was 11 (12.2%), 3 (3.3%), and 3 (6%) in the SS, RFA, and CAA groups, respectively (P = .06). No patient had required reintervention. The median loss of workdays for the SS, RFA, and CAA group was 15 days (interquartile range [IQR], 10-30 days), 0 days (IQR, 0-6 days), and 0 days (IQR, 0-1 days), respectively (P < .001). The median level of satisfaction for the SS, RFA, and CAA group was 9 (IQR, 8-10), 10 (IQR, 9-10), and 10 (IQR, 9-10), respectively (P < .001). The QALYs was 2.6 years for all three procedures. The median overall cost was €852 (US$926) for SS, €1002 (US$1089) for RFA, and €1228.3 (US$1335) for CAA. The total cost per QALY was €323/QALY (US$351/QALY) for SS, €380/QALY (US$413/QALY) for RFA, and €467/QALY (US$508/QALY) for CAA. The indirect costs were measured by the cost of the workdays lost for each patient and were €1527 (US$1660; IQR, €1018-3054); €0 (IQR, €0-611) for RFA, and €0 (IQR, €0-102) for CAA (P < .001). CONCLUSIONS: All three techniques were cost-effective (procedures with an incremental cost-effectiveness ratio <€30,000/QALY can be recommended). From the Spanish Public Health System perspective, when considering only the health care costs, the most cost-effective technique was SS. From the social perspective, including the opportunity costs of medical leave, CAA was the most cost-effective technique, saving €1600 per patient, a cost that more than compensated for the savings realized from using SS in direct health care costs.

Management of Persistent SARS-CoV-2 Infection in Patients with Follicular Lymphoma.

INTRODUCTION: There is no consensus on the management of the coronavirus disease (COVID-19) in patients with secondary immunosuppression due to either an underlying hematological disease or to the effects of immunochemotherapy (ICT). Some of them may present persistent infection with multiple relapses of COVID-19, requiring several admissions. This study evaluated the clinical characteristics and outcomes after treatment of 5 patients with follicular lymphoma (FL), previously treated with ICT, who developed several episodes of COVID-19. METHODS: We analyzed the clinical evolution and response to treatment with antiviral agent, steroids, and convalescent plasma in 5 patients with FL and severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) persistent infection. Reverse transcriptase polymerase chain reaction tests and peripheral blood immunophenotype were performed for all patients. RESULTS: All patients required hospitalization due to pneumonia with severity criteria and were re-admitted after a median of 22 days (13-42) from the previous discharge. They all showed B-cell depletion by immunophenotyping, and no traces of immunoglobulin antibodies against SARS-CoV-2 were detected in any of the cases. The survival rate was 80%. CONCLUSION: The combination therapy evidenced clinical benefits, demonstrating its capacity to control infection in immunosuppressed FL patients treated with ICT.

Effect of the Implementation of a Surgical Care Bundle in the Incidence of Surgical Site Infection in Spine Surgery: A Quasi-Experimental Study.

STUDY DESIGN: Quasi-experimental intervention study. OBJECTIVE: To assess the effect of a clinical safety and quality improvement plan for patients undergoing spinal fusion surgery on the incidence of surgical site infection (SSI). SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: In recent years, infection surveillance and control programs based on care bundles have been included in surgical protocols. These have proven to be essential tools for the prevention and control of SSI, providing indicators for improvement and allowing the characterization of related risk factors. METHODS: A quasi-experimental study was carried out with analysis before and after the introduction of a preventive care bundle (clinical safety and quality improvement plan). Patients who underwent spinal fusion surgery were included. The incidence of SSI up to 90 days after surgery (maximum incubation period) was assessed. The effect of the intervention was evaluated with the adjusted odds ratio (oR) using a logistic regression model. RESULTS: A total of 1554 patients were included, 690 in the period 2007 to 2011 (before) and 864 during 2012 to 2018 (after). SSI incidence decreased from 4.2% to 1.9% after the plan (OR: 0.43; 95% confidence interval: 0.23-0.80; P  = 0.006). There was also an improvement in the adequacy of antibiotic prophylaxis, preoperative preparation, and hair removal procedure after the introduction of the care bundle. CONCLUSION: After implementation of the care bundle, the incidence of SSI in spine fusion surgery decreased significantly. Multivariate analysis showed that the care bundle was an independent protective factor. The implementation of these measures should be reinforced on the routine medical practice to reduce the SSI incidence.Level of Evidence: 3.

Hospitalizations related to meningococcal infection in Spain from 1997 to 2018.

BACKGROUND: Baseline hospitalization, mortality, and in-hospital fatality rates for meningococcal infection are required to evaluate preventive interventions, such as the inclusion of the conjugated quadrivalent meningococcal vaccine and serogroup B based protein vaccines. METHODS: All meningococcal infection-related hospitalizations in any diagnostic position in Spain from 1st January 1997 through 31st December 2018 were analysed. The annual hospitalization rate, mortality rate and case-fatality rate were calculated. RESULTS: The average hospitalization rate for meningococcal infection was 1.64 (95% CI 1.61 to 1.66) hospitalizations per 100,000 inhabitants during the study period and significantly decreased from 1997 to 2018. Hospitalizations for meningococcal infection decreased significantly with age and were concentrated in children under 5 years of age (46%). The hospitalization rates reached 29 per 100,000 and 24 per 100,000 children under 1 and 2 years of age, respectively. The in-hospital case-fatality rate was 7.45% (95% CI 7.03 to 7.86). Thirty percent of the deaths occurred in children under 5 years of age, and more than half occurred in adults. The case fatality rate increased significantly with age (p < 0.001). CONCLUSION: It is necessary to maintain epidemiological surveillance of meningococcal infection to determine the main circulating serogroups involved, track their evolution, and evaluate preventive measures whose effectiveness must be assessed in all age groups.

[Experience of a mid-term care facility in the covid-19 with visit protocols.] / Experiencia de un hospital de media estancia en época covid-19 con protocolos de visitas.

OBJECTIVE: The Hospital Virgen de la Poveda, (Villa del Prado, Spain), assists patients in need of Continuous medical care, Rehabilitation or Palliative care; these patients have many risk-factors of COVID-19 morbility and mortality. With both healthcare humanization and contagion-prevention purposes, in July 2020 two patient visit protocols were implemented. The objective of this study is to describe these measures qualitatively and quantitatively. METHODS: A context is provided regarding COVID-19 measures in this institution. The content and follow-up indicators of visit protocols (number of visits, of outbreaks, inpatients, etc.) and of their context were provided. The empirical outbreak probabilities were calculated, and hypothesis contrast was performed against no-visits (0%) and no visit-control (7-day cumulative incidence/habitant). RESULTS: Two protocols were created. Accompanying was applied to Palliative Care cases (no appointments required, no time limits), and a short visits protocol was applied to the other patients (appointments for 1 weekly visit for 1-2 persons were given and visits last up to 45 minutes). In both protocols, visitors with symptoms or fever or particularly susceptible were forbidden entrance. Between July and April 2021, 4,759 short-visit appointments were given and 7,544 total visits took place (short visits, accompanying, exceptions). An outbreak was possibly attributed to short visits (probability=0.021% [CI95%: 0.0005-0.1171%]) and two outbreaks were possibly attributed to visits globally (probability=0.0265% [IC95%: 0.0032-0.0958%]). CONCLUSIONS: Elaborating adapted, applicable and prospectively-evaluated protocols with prevention measures at multiple levels might succeed in minimizing the risk of adverse events (in this case, COVID-19 outbreaks).

OBJETIVO: El Hospital Virgen de la Poveda atiende a pacientes con necesidades de Cuidados Continuos, Rehabilitación o Cuidados Paliativos, que presentan factores de riesgo de morbilidad y mortalidad por COVID-19. Para humanizar la asistencia sanitaria, se implementaron en julio de 2020 protocolos de visitas que minimizasen el riesgo de contagio. El objetivo de este estudio fue realizar una descripción cualitativa y cuantitativa de tales medidas. METODOS: Se contextualizó el problema de las medidas ante el COVID-19 de esta institución. Se recogió el contenido e indicadores de seguimiento de los protocolos de visitas (número de visitas, de brotes, ocupación, etc.) y de contexto. Se calcularon probabilidades empíricas de brote y contraste de hipótesis: vs. no-visitas (0%), y vs. no-control (incidencia acumulada); (distribución de Poisson). RESULTADOS: Se crearon dos protocolos: acompañamiento (para Cuidados Paliativos, sin citas y sin límite a la duración); y visitas cortas con cita previa (para los demás, limitadas a 45 minutos, 1-2 personas por paciente, 1 visita semanal). En ambos casos se controlaron el acceso de personas con síntomas o especialmente susceptibles. Entre julio 2020 y abril de 2021 se dieron 4.759 citas para visitas cortas (con 1 posible brote atribuido, probabilidad de brote=0,021% [IC95%: 0,0005-0,1171%]) y se produjeron en total 7.544 visitas (citadas, acompañamiento y excepcionales; con 2 posibles brotes atribuidos, probabilidad de brote=0,0265% [IC95%: 0,0032-0,0958%]). CONCLUSIONES: La elaboración de protocolos con medidas de prevención a múltiples niveles, adaptados, aplicables y con un adecuado seguimiento, puede conseguir minimizar el riesgo de aparición de eventos negativos (brotes en este caso).

Antibiotic prophylaxis adequacy assessment and its influence on surgical site infection in peripheral vascular bypass surgery.

OBJECTIVE: We sought to assess the degree of antibiotic prophylaxis adequacy to our surgical antibiotic prophylaxis protocol among patients who underwent peripheral vascular bypass surgery. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Prospective cohort study. Adequacy to protocol was studied by comparing the different aspects of prophylaxis received by patients to those stipulated in the protocol in force at our hospital. Incidence of surgical wound infection was calculated and the effect of prophylaxis inadequacy on the incidence of surgical wound infection was estimated using the relative risk. RESULTS: The study covered 266 patients. Incidence of surgical site infection (SSI) after the follow-up period was 5.3% (95% Confidence interval [CI]: 3.0-9.4). Overall adequacy to the protocol of antibiotic prophylaxis was 91.0% (95% CI: 87.6-94.4). The most frequent cause of inadequacy to the protocol was time of initiation of antibiotic prophylaxis (94.1%). No relationship was found between SSI and antibiotic prophylaxis inadequacy (relative risk: 2.4; 95% CI: 0.49-12.5; p > 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: Global adequacy to protocol of antibiotic prophylaxis was high. The most frequent cause of inadequacy to the protocol was time of initiation of antibiotic prophylaxis.

OBJETIVO: Buscamos evaluar el grado de adecuación de la profilaxis antibiótica a nuestro protocolo de profilaxis antibiótica quirúrgica entre los pacientes sometidos a cirugía de bypass vascular periférico. MATERIAL Y MÉTODOS: Estudio de cohortes prospectivo. La adecuación al protocolo se estudió comparando los diferentes aspectos de la profilaxis recibida por los pacientes con los estipulados en el protocolo vigente en nuestro hospital. Se calculó la incidencia de infección de herida quirúrgica y se estimó el efecto de la inadecuación de la profilaxis sobre la incidencia de infección de herida quirúrgica mediante el riesgo relativo. RESULTADOS: El estudio abarcó 266 pacientes. La incidencia de infección del sitio quirúrgico (ISQ) tras el periodo de seguimiento fue del 5,3% (intervalo de confianza [IC] del 95%: 3,0-9,4). La adecuación global al protocolo de profilaxis antibiótica fue del 91,0% (IC 95%: 87,6-94,4). La causa más frecuente de inadecuación al protocolo fue el momento de inicio de la profilaxis antibiótica (94,1%). No se encontró relación entre ISQ e inadecuación de la profilaxis antibiótica (riesgo relativo: 2,4; IC 95%: 0,49-12,5; p > 0,05). CONCLUSIONES: La adecuación global al protocolo de la profilaxis antibiótica fue alta. La causa más frecuente de inadecuación al protocolo fue el momento de inicio de la profilaxis antibiótica.

Effect of a surgical care bundle on the incidence of surgical site infection in colorectal surgery: a quasi-experimental intervention

Background: Surgical site infections (SSI) have an important impact on morbidity and mortality. Objective: This study, therefore, sought to assess the effect of a surgical care bundle on the incidence of SSI in colorectal surgery. Methods: We conducted a quasi-experimental intervention study with reference to the introduction of a surgical care bundle in 2011. Our study population, made up of patients who underwent colorectal surgery, was divided into the following two periods: 2007-2011 (pre-intervention) and 2012-2017 (post-intervention). The intervention's effect on SSI incidence was analyzed using adjusted odds ratios (OR). Results: A total of 1,727 patients were included in the study. SSI incidence was 13.0% before versus 11.6% after implementation of the care bundle (OR: 0.88, 95% confidence interval: 0.66-1.17, p = 0.37). Multivariate analysis showed that cancer, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, neutropenia, and emergency surgery were independently associated with SSI. In contrast, laparoscopic surgery proved to be a protective factor against SSI. Conclusions: Care bundles have proven to be very important in reducing SSI incidence since the measures that constitute these protocols are mutually reinforcing. In our study, the implementation of a care bundle reduced SSI incidence from 13% to 11.6%, though the reduction was not statistically significant.